We paired 158,165 real purchases with the later sale of the same home, across 740 private condos and executive condominiums from 1995 to 2026, and added 18,013 landed resales from 500 estates. The middle condo or EC grew 3.4% a year, 1.5% after inflation, and rent paid about 3.6% gross on top. Search a home, or narrow the map below.
Opens the condo's full record: every matched resale, its growth a year and its rental yield.
Southbank, Citylights, Caspian and The Sail @ Marina Bay. Among the 301 completed projects with at least 200 matched resales, these four grew fastest per year of ownership: from 13.1% to 17.2% a year for the middle seller, or 7.1% to 10.3% after inflation. Every sale counts, winners and losers together.
Read this before you get excited. All four were finished between 2007 and 2012. Most of their sellers bought before the 2009 to 2013 price surge and sold into it, so the growth describes the price those owners paid as much as the building. You would be buying at today's price, under stamp duty and loan rules that did not exist then. Open each project's full record before drawing a conclusion, and see how growth varied by the year owners bought.
Both new projects beat their older neighbours, even after starting $150 to $400 per square foot higher. What the winners had in common.
39 owners sold before the building was finished, and all made money. Here is what the developer paid for the land.
It ended on 28 July. In its place is a six-month deadline to sell after you buy. Who that covers, and who still waits 30 months.
Across 158,165 paired sales in 740 completed Singapore condominiums and executive condominiums, the middle home grew 3.4% a year, or 1.5% after inflation, over a typical 8.7-year hold. Rent added about 3.6% gross on top. 88.0% of sales went for more than the owner paid. The strongest single project, out of those with at least 100 sales, is Southbank in District 7 at 17.2% a year.
Five terms used on this page
Median, all sales, winners and losers
74.8% of sales beat inflation
Median project, before costs
Purchase to resale
Every paired buy-and-sell, 1995–2026
139,192 of 158,165 sales
| Project | District | Tenure | Growth a year | Yield | Sales | Avg psf | Sold above cost |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Southbank | D07 · RCR | Leasehold | 17.2% | 5.3% | 310 | $1,123 | 100.0% |
| The Beacon | D02 · CCR | Leasehold | 16.0% | 5.7% | 166 | $1,945 | 99.4% |
| Citylights | D08 · RCR | Leasehold | 14.2% | 5.4% | 775 | $1,105 | 99.2% |
| Caspian | D22 · OCR | Leasehold | 13.6% | 5.6% | 582 | $1,701 | 100.0% |
| The Sail @ Marina Bay | D01 · CCR | Leasehold | 13.1% | 4.4% | 1,435 | $1,602 | 96.7% |
| The Sea View | D15 · RCR | Freehold | 12.3% | 4.4% | 476 | $1,132 | 99.6% |
| The Metz | D09 · CCR | Freehold | 12.3% | 4.4% | 185 | $1,849 | 99.5% |
| The Azure | D04 · RCR | Leasehold | 12.1% | 3.6% | 131 | $1,410 | 96.9% |
| Alexis | D03 · RCR | Freehold | 11.8% | 5.2% | 300 | $1,326 | 100.0% |
| The Belvedere | D15 · RCR | Freehold | 11.7% | 3.7% | 187 | $1,215 | 97.9% |
| Parc Emily | D09 · CCR | Freehold | 11.3% | 4.8% | 324 | $1,221 | 100.0% |
| Varsity Park Condominium | D05 · RCR | Leasehold | 11.3% | 5.2% | 443 | $1,717 | 99.1% |
| Viz at Holland | D10 · CCR | Freehold | 11.2% | 4.7% | 215 | $1,139 | 100.0% |
| Icon | D02 · CCR | Leasehold | 11.0% | 5.6% | 1,029 | $1,277 | 96.9% |
| City Square Residences | D08 · RCR | Freehold | 10.8% | 5.8% | 898 | $2,278 | 99.4% |
| One Amber | D15 · RCR | Freehold | 10.8% | 4.3% | 688 | $1,117 | 99.0% |
| Park Infinia at Wee Nam | D11 · CCR | Freehold | 10.7% | 4.4% | 453 | $1,396 | 98.2% |
| The Cosmopolitan | D09 · CCR | Freehold | 10.6% | 3.9% | 295 | $1,578 | 99.0% |
| Hundred Palms Residences | D19 · OCR | Leasehold | 10.4% | 2.8% | 138 | $1,864 | 100.0% |
| Meraprime | D03 · RCR | Leasehold | 10.2% | 5.9% | 206 | $2,300 | 100.0% |
| Double Bay Residences | D18 · OCR | Leasehold | 10.0% | 4.6% | 574 | $1,615 | 100.0% |
| Watermark Robertson Quay | D09 · CCR | Freehold | 9.9% | 4.3% | 307 | $1,364 | 97.7% |
| The Esta | D15 · RCR | Freehold | 9.8% | 4.3% | 437 | $1,064 | 100.0% |
| Twin Regency | D03 · RCR | Freehold | 9.7% | 6.1% | 214 | $2,425 | 98.6% |
| The Centris | D22 · OCR | Leasehold | 9.6% | 5.4% | 606 | $1,726 | 99.8% |
| The Berth by the Cove | D04 · RCR | Leasehold | 9.5% | 4.2% | 221 | $1,169 | 99.5% |
| The Imperial | D09 · CCR | Freehold | 9.5% | 4.7% | 225 | $1,318 | 100.0% |
| Blossoms @ Woodleigh | D13 · RCR | Freehold | 9.3% | 6.5% | 161 | $2,317 | 100.0% |
| Sky@Eleven | D11 · CCR | Freehold | 9.2% | 3.7% | 321 | $1,269 | 96.9% |
| The Marbella | D10 · CCR | Freehold | 8.7% | 4.5% | 163 | $1,072 | 99.4% |
| The Pier at Robertson | D09 · CCR | Freehold | 8.7% | 4.8% | 235 | $1,440 | 100.0% |
| Treasure Crest | D19 · OCR | Leasehold | 8.7% | 3.3% | 193 | $1,458 | 100.0% |
| The Regency at Tiong Bahru | D03 · RCR | Freehold | 8.6% | 4.8% | 157 | $1,187 | 100.0% |
| Urbana | D09 · CCR | Freehold | 8.2% | 4.1% | 137 | $1,460 | 100.0% |
| Wandervale | D23 · OCR | Leasehold | 8.2% | 3.3% | 133 | $1,481 | 100.0% |
| Sol Acres | D23 · OCR | Leasehold | 8.0% | 3.9% | 576 | $1,458 | 100.0% |
| Inz Residence | D23 · OCR | Leasehold | 8.0% | 3.4% | 154 | $1,426 | 100.0% |
| Clementiwoods Condominium | D05 · RCR | Leasehold | 7.8% | 5.1% | 269 | $1,614 | 99.3% |
| The Metropolitan Condominium | D03 · RCR | Leasehold | 7.4% | 4.8% | 490 | $1,068 | 97.6% |
| Parc Life | D27 · OCR | Leasehold | 7.4% | 3.6% | 255 | $1,349 | 100.0% |
No projects match these filters.
Districts with fewer than 50 paired sales are left unshaded. A handful of sales cannot tell you what is typical. Only the top five are listed here. The full table for all 28 districts, with yields and loss rates, is on the exit dashboard.
Data updated —
Every listing tells you what a seller wants. This page tells you what sellers actually got. We paired 158,165 purchases with the later sale of the same unit, across 740 completed condominiums and executive condominiums, and the map now adds 482 landed estates. So what you see is a real outcome, not an asking price.
You can check any project here before you commit. Click a marker on the map to see its full record. Rank the strongest performers in the table above, or compare districts. The returns and wealth page shows growth before and after inflation, what rent added, and how the length of the hold and the year the owner bought changed the outcome. Looking at a brand new project instead? The new launch tracker covers everything developers are still selling.
The short version
So what should you do with this? Look up the specific project you are considering rather than trusting the island-wide average. Check three things on its record: how many paired sales it has, what the middle seller made per year, and its rental yield. Then compare that to the district figure on the map. If a project sits well below its district, ask why before you buy.
One thing that makes this different: most published resale statistics quietly drop the sales that lost money. We keep them, so every growth figure here counts winners and losers together. This page is research, not advice.
740 completed condominiums and executive condominiums, 737 of them placed through OneMap, plus 482 landed estates from our landed dataset. Each carries its matched resale record and rental yield. Three condos could not be placed and appear in the list without a marker.
Across 158,165 matched resales of condos and ECs, the middle home grew 3.4% a year in price over a typical 8.7-year hold, or 1.5% a year after inflation. Rent added about 3.6% gross. Every sale counts, including the 12.0% that sold for no more than the owner paid.
How fast that home grew a year for the middle seller: green for 5% or more, blue for 3% to 5%, amber for under 3%. Condos and ECs are circles; landed estates are diamonds. Homes with too few sales to judge are grey. Colour is never the only cue. The same figure is printed on every card and in every popup.
61 projects here are also tracked as new launches. Those markers open the new launch page instead, which adds developer pricing, unit mix and launch analysis to the resale record. We keep one page per project so two of our own pages do not compete for the same search.
One unit bought once and sold later, matched from the two official records of those sales. Profit, holding period and yearly return all come from those two real prices. So the figure describes one owner's round trip, not the movement of a market index.
Gross. It is a year of rent divided by the price, before maintenance, property tax, agent fees, empty months and income tax. An owner paying a mortgage on top keeps a lot less than the headline figure. Use it to compare one project with another, not to predict your income.
By a fixed rule, not by our own taste. We take every completed project with at least 200 matched sales and rank them by how fast the middle seller's home grew per year, counting every sale. We show the top four. The rule runs again on every data refresh. No developer or agency pays to be included.
No. The strongest records here belong to projects finished between 2007 and 2012. Most of their sellers bought before the 2009 to 2013 price surge and sold into it. That tells you about the price those owners paid, not about the building. You would start from today's price, under different stamp duty and loan rules.
It refreshes each time URA releases new sales records. The refresh date sits in the strip at the top of this page, and in the update line above.
No. We are an independent research publication. We do not market projects, take developer fees for coverage, or act as agents. Our editorial policy sets out how we work.
The research on this page tells you what the data says. If you want to work through what it means for your own situation — budget, ABSD position, timing an HDB sale, or comparing your buy-or-sell decision against other options — you can request a one-to-one consultation.
Disclosure: advisory consultations are provided by Jamus Lee (CEA Reg. No. R065771E, ERA Realty Network Pte Ltd, Licence No. L3002382K), the publisher of PropertyInsider.sg, via JamusProperty.com. This is a separate service from our editorial research and has no influence over what we publish. See our editorial policy. Submitting this form shares your details with the advisory practice; see our privacy policy.