Holland Plain's first mover: what $1,432 psf ppr actually buys

What is Holland Plain, and what has actually been awarded?

Holland Plain is a new residential precinct of roughly 34 hectares off Holland Road in District 10, planned under the URA Master Plan with eight residential plots, a wetland park and a community plain. Two have been sold, both to Sim Lian Group. Holland Link was awarded on 7 August 2025 at $1,432 psf ppr and becomes Amberwood at Holland, a 212-unit, six-storey development previewing in September or October 2026 (est.). Holland Plain (Parcel B) followed on 7 May 2026 at $1,491 psf ppr for roughly 280 units. Six plots remain unreleased.

The argument built on that base: the first project into a new precinct enters at a land cost set before comparable evidence exists, and captures whatever the precinct becomes. Reasonable, and easier to make than to check.

How we tested this

Land rates, bid counts and award dates come from our own land cost compilation in the land cost tracker; the comparison set is all eight Core Central Region residential Government Land Sales awards from 1 January 2025 to 15 July 2026, en bloc land excluded. Primary 1 figures come from our schools dataset. Specifications, unit mix and case studies are from the ERA consumer seminar of 30 July 2026, presented by Ryner Koh, Executive Director of Agency at ERA Realty Network. Where the seminar's arithmetic and ours diverge, we show the working. Full detail is in sources and methodology.

Is $1,432 psf ppr really the lowest land cost in the Core Central Region?

Within the last eighteen months, yes. Amberwood at Holland's $1,432 psf ppr is the lowest of the eight Core Central Region Government Land Sales awards in our dataset since January 2025, and it sits 11.9 per cent below that set's median of $1,625 psf ppr. Here is the full set rather than a selection of it.

Two things the headline does not say. The gap to the next-lowest rate is trivial: Amberwood sits $22 psf ppr below River Valley Green (Parcel B) and $22 above Dunearn House, a spread of about 1.5 per cent. "Lowest" means lowest of a tight cluster. And the ranking depends on the window: widen it by fifteen months and the Holland Drive parcel that became Skye at Holland was awarded at $1,285 psf ppr in May 2024, roughly 10 per cent below Amberwood, in the same district. The record is a cycle record, not an all-time one.

The 30.2 per cent figure, and why it points the other way

Peck Hay Road at $1,865 psf ppr is 30.2 per cent above Amberwood at Holland's $1,432 psf ppr. That calculation is correct and takes the lower figure as its base. Reverse the base and Amberwood's land rate is 23.2 per cent below Peck Hay Road's. Both describe the same gap; only one answers what a buyer is asking, which is how much less this land cost than that land cost.

The mark-up is always the bigger-sounding number, which is why the table above shows rates rather than percentages.

Why does a Core Central Region site cost less than city-fringe land?

Because psf per plot ratio prices the right to build, and Holland Link is allowed to build much less than its CCR neighbours.

The parcel is 17,069 sqm (about 183,731 sq ft) at a plot ratio of 1.4, with a six-storey height cap set by the surrounding Good Class Bungalow Areas. That yields about 257,200 sq ft of gross floor area, and Sim Lian's winning bid of $368.37 million divided by that produces $1,432 psf ppr almost exactly.

Peck Hay Road and River Valley Green (Parcel C) are high-rise sites at far higher plot ratios, spreading land, piling, basement, lift cores and consultants across many more saleable square feet. Low-rise does the opposite, and cannot sell height. A developer bidding on a six-storey parcel prices the land lower precisely because construction cost per saleable square foot runs higher. The low rate is the market's estimate of what the constraint costs, not a windfall.

Two of the seminar's comparisons survive that and remain striking. Amberwood's CCR rate sits below two Rest of Central Region awards from the same cycle: Tanjong Rhu Road at $1,455 psf ppr in February 2026 and Dover Drive at $1,556 psf ppr in March 2026. A CCR site clearing below city-fringe land is unusual, as we noted in the first-half 2026 GLS review: the RCR has re-rated hard while low-density prime land has not.

What launch price does this imply?

PropertyInsider.sg estimates $3,000 to $3,500 psf (est.), the range published on our Amberwood at Holland page and unchanged by this analysis.

The full reasoning is in our pricing methodology. Across tracker projects with both an awarded land rate and matched transaction data, launch pricing runs at a median of about 2.1 times the land rate, compressing as land gets dearer. Applied to $1,432 psf ppr that gives about $3,010 psf, anchoring the bottom of our range. Specification pushes the other way: 3.2m ceilings throughout, marble and ducted air-conditioning in selected units, and V-ZUG, Villeroy & Boch and Liebherr fittings all have to come back somewhere.

Run the same multiple on Holland Plain (Parcel B) at $1,491 psf ppr and you get roughly $3,130 psf (est.) — the first quantified reason to think the second project into the precinct will not be cheaper than the first. That is the first-mover argument in its most defensible form, and it is worth separating from the version leaning on precinct amenities that are neither built nor funded on any published timeline.

The rest of the precinct, and what Parcel B tells us

Six plots remain unawarded as at 3 August 2026, at Master Plan plot ratios between 1.4 and 1.8. Release sits with the Government Land Sales programme, so timing and pricing are open; we track confirmations in the GLS pipeline tracker.

The one hard data point on repricing is Parcel B itself, awarded at $1,491 psf ppr, 4.1 per cent above the Holland Link parcel nine months earlier. More telling is the bid count: Holland Link drew five bidders, Parcel B drew one, where analysts had expected up to six. A sole bidder can still pay a firm rate, and Sim Lian did, but a tender clearing on one bid says something about how narrow appetite for low-density prime land currently is.

Parcel B has its own tracked page at Holland Plain (Parcel B) GLS, carrying the tender data and our estimate. Developer-side material for that parcel, including unit mix and floor plans as they are confirmed, is collected at Holland Plain Residences; the independent numbers to judge those releases against are here.

How strong is the Methodist Girls' School argument?

Amberwood at Holland is presented as within 1km of Methodist Girls' School (Primary) at 11 Blackmore Drive, based on a OneMap School Query. That matters to a highly motivated group of buyers, so it deserves the precise version.

In the 2025 Primary 1 exercise, the school offered 45 Phase 2C vacancies against 78 applicants. Balloting ran among the 54 Singapore Citizen applicants living within 1km, and all 45 places went to that group: about an 83 per cent chance inside the ring, nothing outside it. Phase 2B balloted too, at 35 within-1km citizen applicants for 22 places. Our schools dataset places the school in the highest demand tier on 2025 data.

So the central point survives: living within 1km was the difference between a ballot and no chance. What does not survive is the implication that 1km secures a place. It secured a ballot with roughly a one-in-six chance of failure, and the 2026 exercise is still running as we publish. Our broader work is in what P1 ballot data actually shows, and the mapped rings for every tracked project are in the primary schools proximity map.

On distances. All 1km and 2km distances here are straight-line estimates, not the official MOE home-school distance. No accuracy is guaranteed. Verify any address with the OneMap School Query and MOE before relying on it for registration.

Is 80.5 sqm of land per home actually unusual?

Yes, and this is the least contested claim in the package. Dividing the 17,069 sqm site by 212 units gives 80.5 sqm of land per home, against 57.7 sqm at Dunearn Road, 56.1 sqm at Holland Plain (Parcel B), 25.8 sqm at River Valley Green (Parcel B) and 14.5 sqm at Peck Hay Road, on unit counts published at award.

The ratio is blunt, but at more than five to one against the densest comparable it describes a genuinely different product, and it is the direct consequence of the 1.4 plot ratio. The same constraint that suppressed the land rate produces the space. Treat those two facts as one fact.

The corollary is a running cost. Maintenance is spread across 212 households on 183,731 sq ft of grounds, and that figure is unpublished. It belongs on the preview checklist.

The unit mix is the clearest signal in the whole package

Amberwood at Holland has no one-bedroom and no two-bedroom units. All 212 homes start at three bedrooms: 74 three-bedroom from 872 sq ft, 74 four-bedroom from 1,076 sq ft and 64 five-bedroom from 1,324 sq ft. Floor plans have not been released.

Removing the small formats from a prime 99-year site is deliberate, and worth costing. Small units are the liquid end of a launch: fastest to clear, lowest quantum, early momentum. Dropping them narrows the pool to households that can fund a three-bedroom CCR quantum, and at our estimated range an 872 sq ft unit lands around $2.6 million to $3.05 million (est.) before options.

What the developer buys is a resident-heavy community with low turnover; what it accepts is a thinner market in and out.

What the comparables do and do not prove

The seminar cites five projects within 1km of Methodist Girls' School (Primary), aged 17 to 37 years, with gains of 38 to 236 per cent, and three nature-adjacent projects at 76 to 252 per cent, from URA data via ERA's SALES+ platform. They establish something real: this part of District 10 has held demand through three crises and a decade of cooling measures.

They do not tell you what a 2026 buyer will earn. Every one was bought at 1990s or 2000s prices under a different policy and financing regime, and a gain of 200 per cent over 37 years is 3.0 per cent a year, which sounds different said that way. The sample also contains only projects that still exist and still transact. Our paired studies in did new launches beat resale work through what that does to a real holding period.

The Fourth Avenue Residences study is more useful, being recent and like-for-like on tenure. Ten three-bedroom resales held four to five years, past the seller's stamp duty window, produced gross gains of $300,000 to $520,000, or 10.7 to 19.8 per cent. There were zero four-bedroom resales in the same window, which the seminar reads as larger-home buyers holding longer. Plausible, and unfalsifiable from a zero-transaction sample.

The counter-case

Four reasons the first-mover argument could disappoint.

The precinct is a plan, not a commitment. The wetland park, community plain and green corridors are Master Plan intentions with no published delivery dates, and a first mover lives beside six construction sites the longest.

Benchmarks cut both ways. The argument assumes later plots price higher and drag the first project up. If the remaining six are released into a softer market, or a developer wins one cheaply, the precinct's reference price resets downwards. Parcel B's single bid is why that deserves taking seriously.

The low land cost is mostly explained. Once the 1.4 plot ratio and six-storey cap are priced in, the discount to the CCR median looks less like a mispricing than an accurate read on a harder site to build. Our view: most of the gap does not survive that adjustment.

The exit market is narrow by design. A 212-unit development with nothing below three bedrooms, at a CCR quantum, in a precinct with no completed amenities, will have a smaller resale pool than a conventional launch. Acceptable for a long-term home; a real constraint for a four-to-five-year exit. Our guide to buying a new launch condo covers what to establish first, and the affordability calculator shows what this range implies for you.

What we expect, and what would prove us wrong

Stated so it can be checked later.

• Amberwood at Holland prices in the $3,000 to $3,500 psf band at preview (est.). Above $3,500 would mean specification and scarcity outweighed the land rate, and we would revise the multiple we apply to low-density prime sites. Below $3,000 would mean Sim Lian is pricing for volume against a narrow pool.
• Take-up runs slower than a comparable CCR launch carrying small formats. A three-bedroom minimum restricts the pool. If it clears at a high percentage on launch weekend, the family-format thesis is stronger than we credit.
• The next Holland Plain plot is awarded above $1,491 psf ppr. Two consecutive rises would confirm the precinct is repricing upward. A lower award breaks the core of the first-mover argument, and the one-bid tender makes that a live possibility.
• No completed precinct amenity before 2030 (est.). If the wetland park or community plain lands materially earlier, the first-mover case is better than we have credited.

The ten-year land series is in the land cost tracker, the pipeline in the GLS pipeline tracker, and everything preparing to launch in upcoming launches. On timing, our standing view is buy, wait or upgrade; long-run resale outcomes sit in the price trends dashboard; and the new launch comparison tool puts Amberwood beside the rest.

Frequently asked questions

Sources & methodology

Land rates, award dates, bid counts and estimated unit counts are from the PropertyInsider land cost compilation, built from URA and HDB tender results and published in the land cost tracker. The comparison set is every Core Central Region residential Government Land Sales award between 1 January 2025 and 15 July 2026, eight sites; collective sales are excluded, and the $1,625 psf ppr median is the median of those eight. The May 2024 Holland Drive figure sits outside the window and is cited only to show the effect of the cut-off.

The gross floor area check uses the published site area of 17,069 sqm at a plot ratio of 1.4 against Sim Lian Group's winning bid of $368.37 million, reproducing $1,432 psf ppr to within a dollar. Primary 1 figures are from our schools dataset, compiled from MOE's published 2025 and 2026 results; the 2026 exercise was still running on publication day. Specifications, unit mix, land per home ratios and the SALES+ case studies are as presented in the ERA consumer seminar of 30 July 2026 by Ryner Koh, Executive Director of Agency, ERA Realty Network, and are reproduced as attributed claims rather than independently verified figures. Floor plans, pricing and maintenance charges were unreleased at publication. The launch estimate follows our pricing methodology.

Back to all research